Ninebot E3 Pro E vs Ninebot E3 E
Scores and specs side by side: who wins on each, the reasons to choose either one, and our verdict.
Ninebot E3 Pro E wins
It wins 2 of the specs to 1; not both have an overall score yet.
Reasons to choose the Ninebot E3 Pro E
- Longer claimed range (55 km vs 45 km)
- Bigger battery (368 Wh vs 276 Wh)
Reasons to choose the Ninebot E3 E
- Charges faster (5.5 h vs 7 h)
- Better safety kit (81 vs 76)
Verdict
The Ninebot E3 Pro E wins more of the head-to-head specs (2 to 1). Choose the Ninebot E3 Pro E if you want longer claimed range and bigger battery. Choose the Ninebot E3 E if you want charges faster and better safety kit.
| Spec | Ninebot E3 Pro E | Ninebot E3 E |
|---|---|---|
| Score | ||
| Overall score | 46 | 46 |
| Performance | 12 | 12 |
| Range & battery | 19 | 17 |
| Comfort | 69 | 69 |
| Portability | 92 | 90 |
| Safety | 76 | 81 |
| Smart features | 56 | 56 |
| Performance | ||
| Top speed | 25 km/h | 25 km/h |
| Peak power | 800 W | 800 W |
| Hill climbing | 18° | 18° |
| Max load | 100 kg | 100 kg |
| Drive | Single motor | Single motor |
| Battery & range | ||
| Claimed range | 55 km | 45 km |
| Battery capacity | 368 Wh | 276 Wh |
| Battery voltage | 36 V | 36 V |
| Charge time | 7 h | 5.5 h |
| Build & comfort | ||
| Weight | 17.9 kg | 17.5 kg |
| Wheel size | 10″ | 10″ |
| Suspension | Front & rear elastomer | Dual elastomer suspension |
| Tires | Tubeless pneumatic | Tubeless pneumatic |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Safety | ||
| Brakes | Front drum & rear electronic | Front drum brake and rear electronic brake |
| Water resistance | IPX5 | IPX5 |
| Turn signals | Yes | Yes |
| Smart features | ||
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| GPS tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Riding modes | Yes | Yes |
| OTA updates | Yes | Yes |
Ticks mark the better value; values within 3% (or 3 score points) count as a draw. A dash means the spec isn't published.